I would have "agreed to disagree" had I known, from the start, your hatred of D&D comes from CRPGS - SOLELY. At which point, yes, I could be made to see your point of view. I was operating on the assumption you had played D&D itself (as in the pen and paper game) - and perhaps that was my error. But when you said you hated D&D, and that you don't have time for "D&D Studies" - I assumed, that meant you knew there were QUITE a few books for the pen & paper D&D game (we're talking well over 20 or 30 books now, for the latest edition). And I could see how that would be intimidating for the new player to D&D.DeadPoolX wrote:A civil conversation doesn't include one person hammering away at another. In contrast, a civil conversation DOES include agreeing to disagree.
You've failed on all counts.
So this thread lost any "civil conversation" long ago.
And I hardly think that three or four posts (one of them being the start and asking why you hated D&D is hardly "hammering away" at someone). Again, my posts - if you look back - are all going on the assumption you had played the Pen & Paper version of the game. My error, admittedly, for assuming as such. And for that, my apologies. I was just trying to figure out why you hated it so much. If your sole experience is with CRPGs for D&D, and you hate - then so be it. I won't argue further about it. You hate CRPGs based on D&D. Fine. End of the line.
I even tried to show, that I honestly believe you were more intelligent than myself - and you even turned THAT comment around and make a snarky, sarcastic remark out of it.